ArticleVeterinary medicine international2026
Postmortem Abdominal Ultrasound in Healthy Wild Mammals for Application in Forensic Veterinary Medicine.
Article in Veterinary medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postmortem Abdominal Ultrasound in Healthy Wild Mammals for Application in Forensic Veterinary Medicine.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic imaging methods have been used in human medicine to identify and examine cadavers to determine the cause of death. In veterinary medicine, the use of these resources is still scarce and little known, and it is necessary to establish the contribution that methods such as ultrasound could provide to the investigation of the cause of death in domestic and wild animals. Postmortem ultrasonography (PMUS) can help forensic science find injuries that even in conventional necropsy go unnoticed. Thus, knowing the sensitivity and accuracy of the method is important and, therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the technique and describe the abdominal ultrasound findings in carcasses of wild mammals that died of natural causes and in different states of autolysis. Considering that wild animals are often found in adverse situations, such as the time elapsed before they are discovered, the conservation temperature and environmental conditions that may mask the true state of autolysis, and since ultrasound is portable, this tool becomes important for the forensic expert's decision-making. Thus, we hypothesise that the application of PMUS is an important alternative for establishing the thanatological state (TS) and the conditions for performing conventional necropsy. The choice of wild mammals was made due to their similarity with domestic mammals, which facilitates the search for literature and standards. Animals received by the Instituto de Criminalística Nacional (National Forensic Institute) of the Federal Police of Brazil were used. Eighteen wild mammal carcasses were examined, in varying autolytic states: three pumas (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.