ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Positive B cell flow cytometry crossmatch without detectable donor-specific antibodies: true or false reactivity?
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In kidney transplant workups, supplementing flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs) with solid-phase assays (SPAs) helps differentiate between true positive from false positive results, which can prevent unnecessary waitlist delays. This study presents an analysis of three discordant cases characterized by positive B-cell FCXM results and the absence of detectable donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Peripheral blood samples were obtained from both recipients and donors for HLA typing, FCXM, antibody screening, and surrogate crossmatches, with expanded single antigen bead assays at One Lambda laboratory to detect unidentifiable antibodies. Initial FCXM positivity did not correlate with SPA-confirmed DSAs. However, surrogate crossmatch results varied: Recipient 1 had unacceptable antigen leading to a halted transplant, Recipient 2's negative results allowed the transplant to proceed, and Recipient 3's mixed results led to the decision not to proceed with the transplant due to an unacceptable antigen. The findings suggest that a positive FCXM, in the absence DSAs, may be interpreted as false positive, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive testing in the pre-transplant evaluation process. Employing multiple diagnostic techniques ensures more accurate risk assessments, improves transplant outcomes, and expands the pool of suitable donors, emphasizing the critical role of thorough HLA and non-HLA antibody evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.