ArticleBone reports2026
Effectiveness of romosozumab following prior raloxifene treatment in primary osteoporosis: An observational study.
Article in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody that increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. It has been available for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures in Japan since 2019. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical effectiveness and safety of romosozumab following previous treatment with raloxifene. The study had an observational pre-post design and included 62 women with primary osteoporosis. Romosozumab 210 mg was administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 months in patients who had been previously treated with raloxifene (raloxifene group,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.