Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660564›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026

Prefrontal TDCS does not improve working memory performance in individuals with chronic alcohol and tobacco use.

Franziska Göttgens, Ute Habel, Paul Wallheinke, Julie A Blendy, Carmen Weidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franziska GöttgensDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Westphalia, North Rhine 52074, Germany.
Ute HabelDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Westphalia, North Rhine 52074, Germany.
Paul WallheinkeDepartment of Child and Youth Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum, Rotenburg, Lower Saxony 27356, Germany.
Julie A BlendyDepartment of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA.
Carmen WeidlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Westphalia, North Rhine 52074, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) deficits are common in psychiatric disorders that are associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activity. As WM is essential for cognitive functions, deficits interfere with daily life and treatment. The lateralization of WM components remains unclear, but stimuli matching, often assessed using the n-back task, has been associated with right-hemispheric dominance. This study examines whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) could enhance WM performance in alcohol-dependent patients (AD), tobacco users (TU) and healthy controls (HC). In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, tDCS was applied to upregulate right DLPFC activity. A total of 46 participants received anodal tDCS with a current intensity of 1.5 mA for 20 min or sham stimulation. In addition to the 7x5cm anode, a large reference electrode (10x10cm) was situated over the contralateral supraorbital area. While being stimulated, participants performed the n-back task as a measure of WM performance. Results revealed no significant differences in WM performance between active and sham stimulated participants, nor between groups, and no significant interaction between stimulation condition and group. Bayesian analysis supported the null effects. These findings do not provide evidence that single-session right DLPFC stimulation reliably enhances working memory across all stimulus types. The outcomes may have been influenced by task-stimulation mismatch, sample heterogeneity, small sample size, and stimulation parameters, which could limit the ability to detect subtle tDCS effects in both clinical and healthy populations.

Indexed as

Alcohol dependenceNicotinePrefrontal cortexTranscranial direct current stimulationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41660564
PMCPMC12874797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.