ArticleJSES international2026
Optimizing tendon-to-bone healing: a comparative study of intratunnel and anatomical repairs in rotator cuff tears.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff tears are a leading cause of shoulder pain, with high rerupture rates despite advancements in surgical techniques. Tendon-to-bone healing failure is often attributed to insufficient fibrocartilage regeneration at the repair site. Intratunnel repair (TR) has been proposed as an alternative approach to enhance healing by increasing tendon-bone contact and exposure to marrow-derived stem cells. However, its effectiveness in chronic rotator cuff tears remains unclear. This study aims to compare the biomechanical and histological outcomes of TR and surface repair (SR) in a rabbit model. We hypothesized that TR might offer advantages in tendon-to-bone healing compared to SR, particularly through enhanced contact area and marrow exposure. Methods: A chronic rotator cuff tear model was created in 36 New Zealand White rabbits by tenotomizing the subscapularis tendon and preventing spontaneous healing for 8 weeks. The right shoulders underwent TR, while the left shoulders received SR. Biomechanical and histological evaluations were performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postrepair. Biomechanical testing assessed failure load, stiffness, and elongation. Histological assessments included collagen fiber organization, fibrocartilage formation, vascularity, and tendon maturation using Modified Watson tendon maturation scoring. Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric tests with a significance level of Results: Biomechanical results showed no significant differences in failure load between TR and SR at any time point ( Discussion: Contrary to our hypothesis, TR did not demonstrate superior healing outcomes compared to SR. While TR provided similar biomechanical properties, its histological outcomes were inferior over time. We speculate that increased inflammatory response and tendon micromotion within the tunnel may have contributed to the inferior histological healing observed in the TR group. Conclusion: These findings suggest that TR does not offer significant advantages over SR in chronic rotator cuff tears. Further studies are needed to optimize healing strategies within the bone tunnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.