Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660538›Full record

ArticleJSES international2026

Risk factors for retear of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using triple-row technique.

Ryosuke Takahashi, Ryosuke Sagami, Yohei Harada, Yukihiro Kajita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryosuke TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Ryosuke SagamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Yohei HaradaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukihiro KajitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The triple-row (TR) technique enhances tendon-to-bone contact and repair integrity in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, limited studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes and risk factors for retears following this technique. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between retear and nonretear groups after ARCR using the TR technique and identify risk factors for retear. Methods: Patients who underwent ARCR using the TR technique with at least 24 months follow-up were enrolled and categorized into retear and nonretear groups. Clinical outcomes, including range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, Constant Shoulder (CS), and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, were evaluated at 3, 6, and 24 months postoperatively. The retear rate and tendon integrity were assessed at 3, 6, and 24 months follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging, and risk factors for retear were analyzed. Results: Of 181 patients enrolled, 20 (11%) had retears and 161 (89%) had no retears. The retear group was significantly older ( Conclusion: ARCR using the TR technique provides favorable clinical outcomes, even in cases with retears. However, patients with retears-especially those with large-to-massive tears or severe infraspinatus fatty infiltration-showed inferior outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairClinical outcomeInfraspinatus tendonRange of motionRetearTriple-row technique

Identifiers

PMID41660538
PMCPMC12874291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.