ArticleJSES international2026
Labral morphology does not compensate for reduced bony glenoid concavity in stable shoulders.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glenoid concavity plays a critical role in shoulder stability via the concavity-compression mechanism. While the bony glenoid concavity, quantified by the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR), is a known determinant of stability, the labrum also contributes to the overall glenoid concavity. It remains unclear whether the labrum compensates for reduced bony concavity in stable shoulders. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between labral and bony glenoid concavity implementing the labral shoulder stability ratio (LSSR) and BSSR, respectively. We hypothesized that shoulders with reduced bony concavity (lower BSSR) would demonstrate increased labral concavity (higher LSSR), suggesting a compensatory mechanism. Methods: In this retrospective imaging study, 36 patients (mean age: 26.7 years) undergoing shoulder computed tomography arthrography between January 2020 and December 2024 for noninstability indications were included. BSSR and LSSR were calculated from standardized axial computed tomography images using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions. Concavity depth and radius were measured on the bony and chondrolabral contours, and the respective stability ratios were calculated. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation. Pearson correlation analysis and subgroup comparisons were conducted to assess the relationship between BSSR and LSSR. Results: The mean BSSR was 28.3% ± 11.1% (range: 10.2%-52.5%), and the mean LSSR was 77.9% ± 10.8% (range: 49.1%-100%). There was no significant correlation between BSSR and LSSR (r = 0.01, Conclusion: This study demonstrates that labral morphology does not compensate for reduced bony glenoid concavity in clinically stable shoulders. Contrary to our hypothesis, lower BSSR was not associated with increased labral concavity, and no inverse relationship was observed between bone and labral curvature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.