ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A study on the accessibility and utilisation of targeted drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension in China.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk stratification and multidisciplinary management strategies for pregnancy complicated by pulmonary arterial hypertension: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the availability, price levels, affordability, and utilisation of targeted drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in China. Methods: This study utilized a retrospective longitudinal design, based on drug procurement data from 859 public hospitals in China, covering the period from January 2019 to December 2023. Accessibility of 11 PAH-targeted therapies was evaluated across three key dimensions: availability (proportion of hospitals stocking the drug), price level (the Defined Daily Dose cost, namely, DDDc = Total annual drug expenditure/DDDs of the drug), and affordability (out-of-pocket expenses as a percentage of household disposable income). Results: While there was a significant overall improvement in the accessibility of PAH-targeted drugs, structural disparities in accessibility were evident across different drug types, hospital tiers, and between urban and rural areas, as well as among income groups. Availability data showed that tertiary hospitals had significantly better access to NMI-negotiated drugs than secondary hospitals (p = 0.006). Among all drugs, treprostinil had the highest availability (56.1% across hospitals), while newer drugs such as selexipag had very low availability (<10%). Price analysis revealed that the DDDc for most drugs had significantly decreased, including sildenafil (-91.0%) and macitentan (-95.2%), while iloprost remained costly (>3,700 CNY). In terms of affordability, in 2023, all drugs were affordable for the highest-income urban groups, while no drugs were affordable for the lowest-income rural groups, with the cost burden of iloprost accounting for 8,454.8% of the disposable income of the rural population. Drug accessibility exhibited significant structural imbalances, with some drugs being "affordable but hard to obtain" (e.g., riociguat) and others "highly burdensome and poorly accessible" (e.g., treprostinil). Conclusion: The findings demonstrate significant improvements in the affordability and availability of PAH-targeted therapies over the study period; however, notable inequalities persist in accessibility improvements across urban and rural areas and income groups. Future policies should be tailored to address specific accessibility challenges for different drug categories and focus on overcoming medication access barriers for low-income rural populations to foster health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.