ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Efficacy and safety of virtual-assisted lung mapping using dual staining with indigo carmine and indocyanine green in sublobar lung resection: a single-arm prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of the RC120 navigation system for the computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a prospective study with historical controls.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Nodule Localization in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Existing and Emerging Techniques.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) using indigo carmine is widely used to localize small pulmonary nodules during sublobar lung resection. However, the visibility of markings remains suboptimal. We developed a novel dual-staining technique (VAL-MAP DS) that combines indigo carmine and indocyanine green (ICG) to enhance marking visibility. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of VAL-MAP DS. Methods: This single-arm prospective cohort study included patients who underwent sublobar resection of pulmonary nodules at a single tertiary center. Preoperative VAL-MAP DS was performed using bronchoscopic dye injection with both indigo carmine and ICG. The primary endpoint was the success rate of marking detection, defined as intraoperative visibility of either indigo carmine or ICG. Secondary endpoints included the successful resection rate, bronchoscopy-related adverse events, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 158 markings were performed for 51 nodules in 48 patients. The overall marking success rate was 98.1% [155/158; 95% confidence interval (CI): 94.6-99.6%] and significantly exceeded the threshold of 90% based on historical data of conventional VAL-MAP using indigo carmine alone. The successful resection rate was 94.1% (48/51; 95% CI: 83.8-98.8%). Bronchoscopy-related adverse events and postoperative complications occurred in 4.2% and 6.3%, respectively. Conclusions: VAL-MAP DS may enhance intraoperative marking visibility with minimal procedural risk. This dual-staining approach enables more accurate sublobar resections and may reduce the number of markings required per lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.