Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Measuring optic nerve sheath diameter in children: a simple ultrasound protocol for ICP assessment.

Bogdana Sabina Zoica, Bipin Chalattil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bogdana Sabina ZoicaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bipin ChalattilIntensive Care, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prompt and accurate detection of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is vital in the management of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). While invasive ICP monitoring remains the gold standard, its application is often limited by contraindications or local logistical constraints. Consequently, a substantial number of moderate TBI cases are managed without direct ICP monitoring, despite the risk of secondary intracranial hypertension. This underscores the need for reliable, non-invasive diagnostic alternatives. One such technique-optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement via point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-leverages cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation around the retrobulbar optic nerve as a surrogate marker for raised ICP. Although ONSD is recognised for its simplicity, speed, and repeatability, its clinical adoption in pediatric settings remains limited due to the absence of standardised guidelines and normative data. This manuscript synthesises the current evidence on ONSD measurement in children, highlighting its diagnostic potential, methodological considerations, and limitations. By consolidating recent research, we aim to support pediatric intensivists in the practical application of ONSD as a non-invasive tool for ICP assessment, ultimately improving clinical decision-making and prognostic evaluation in pediatric TBI.

Indexed as

ICPONSDoptic nerve sheath diameterPOCUSpoint-of-care ultrasoundraised intracranial pressuretraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41660398
PMCPMC12872901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.