ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Risk factors and imaging features of a rudimentary horn pregnancy: A case report and literature review.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rudimentary horn is a type of congenital uterine anomaly associated with a unicornuate uterus. Rudimentary horn pregnancies (RHPs) are extremely rare and the majority of cases result in second trimester rupture necessitating emergent laparotomy with associated high maternal morbidity and delivery of a previable fetus. We report the case of a 33-year-old G5P0131 female who presented at 15 weeks and 4 days gestational age with pelvic and back pain and imaging favoring an abdominal pregnancy. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy with left salpingectomy and excision of an unruptured extrauterine pregnancy that was confirmed to be an RHP on pathologic examination. Postsurgery review of the imaging demonstrated several features consistent with the diagnosis of an RHP that were not initially identified. Furthermore, the patient's medical and surgical histories were notable for several risk factors associated with congenital uterine anomalies that should have heightened the clinical suspicion for an RHP. This case emphasizes how increased familiarity with the risk factors and imaging findings associated with rudimentary horns and RHPs may lead to an earlier and more accurate diagnosis, more timely and appropriate treatment, and ultimately a reduction in maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.