In one paragraphArticle in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Ying LiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-0015 Zhen-Yu LiState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1224-0692 Wan-Ting GeState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4009-8481 Nan LuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-5217 Wen-Jun MaState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-3765 Jun-Hui WangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Chinese Academy of Forestry and Northeast Forestry University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0384-4746 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
BignoniaceaeCatalpachloroplast genomemorphologySNPs
Identifiers
PMID41660361
PMCPMC12873570
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390