ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Surgical management of aplasia cutis congenita of the scalp and skull defect in a resource-limited setting: A case report.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is a rare congenital condition marked by the absence of skin layers and sometimes underlying structures. Its etiology is unclear, with up to 70% of cases involving the scalp. We report the first document case of ACC in Ghana. Case Description: A 1-day-old female, born through spontaneous vaginal delivery after an uneventful pregnancy, was referred for management of a scalp defect noted at birth. Examination revealed an 8 × 5.5 cm central scalp defect with absent cranial vault, partial fronto-parietal bone loss, dural defect, exposed arachnoid membranes, and visible superior sagittal sinus. Other physical findings were normal. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whole-body MRI, and echocardiography were unremarkable. A brain computed tomography confirmed a skull defect. The patient underwent a duraplasty using bovine pericardium and received serial wound dressings with epithelial growth factors. The defect reduced to 4.5 × 3.6 cm post-surgery and continues to improve pending potential cranioplasty at 2 years. ACC is primarily diagnosed clinically, and this patient was diagnosed with type 1 ACC. Management depends on subtype, location, defect size, and infection risk. In this case, surgery was employed due to the size of defect and the risk it posed. Prognosis is generally favorable, but limited resources may delay and increase complications in low-income settings. Conclusion: ACC with skull and dural involvement poses serious risks to infant survival in resource-limited settings, where systemic challenges are pervasive. This case highlights the importance of care that is locally adapted, affordable, and delivered through strong multidisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.