ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Differences in Measurement of Glenoid Morphology Between Radiographs and Computed Tomography.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) requires deliberate preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid deformity. The shoulder β and RSA angles, as described by Mauer and Boileau, respectively, are of value for preoperative planning for RSA. Purposes: To evaluate differences in relevant glenoid markers, such as the β and RSA angles, between plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans and to further introduce and evaluate a novel measurement, the inferior glenoid bony resection depth (BRD), which is the resection distance required for placement of a baseplate in 0° of superior inclination. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with both plain radiographs and CT scans of the shoulder performed at the same institution within 3 months were reviewed. The shoulder β and RSA angles and BRD were assessed using radiographs and 2-dimensional CT scans. All radiographic measures were compared based on imaging modality (radiographs vs 2-dimensional CT scan). A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate differences between male and female patients. Results: In total, 41 patients were included. The mean β angle on radiographs was greater than when measured using CT (78.8° vs 76.9°, Conclusion: Plain radiographs may overestimate shoulder β angle and inferior glenoid resection. In addition, inferior glenoid resection depth necessary to achieve a neutral baseplate, as measured on both radiograph and CT, would lead to overresection of the glenoid, putting patients at risk for implant subsidence. We further found that there may be differences in glenoid inclination based on patient sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.