ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Assessing the educational quality of YouTube videos on celiac plexus blocks: Expert review and AI-based evaluation.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: YouTube is an open-access platform increasingly used for both medical and patient education, but its user-generated content is not subject to peer review and shows wide variability in accuracy and quality. Celiac plexus blocks are technically complex procedures that are presented on YouTube, yet the educational quality of these instructional videos has not yet been systematically evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the educational quality of YouTube videos on celiac plexus blocks and to explore the utility of ChatGPT-4o as a secondary, adjunctive tool for assessing video quality. Methods: YouTube was searched on June 2nd, 2025 using the keywords "celiac plexus neurolysis," "celiac block for cancer pain," "celiac plexus block," and "celiac plexus injection." The 17 most-viewed videos were independently evaluated by two board-certified chronic pain physicians and by ChatGPT-4o using a modified DISCERN scale (mDISCERN), the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and a usefulness classification. Results: Based on human expert ratings, only 18 % of videos contained highly reliable information as assessed by the mDISCERN scale, and 24 % demonstrated moderate to excellent information quality on the Global Quality Scale. Overall, 65 % of videos were classified as useful. Inter-rater reliability between human experts ranged from poor to moderate across the three scales of evaluation, while agreement between human expert and ChatGPT-4o assessment was poor. Conclusions: The educational quality of YouTube videos on celiac plexus blocks was generally poor. Unlike similar studies investigating other procedures, the quality of videos produced by physician and hospital sources was not better than that of videos by nonacademic sources. These findings highlight the need to improve the quality of educational content produced by physicians, hospitals, and professional societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.