Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660265›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Late

Fang Wang, Jiaqi Feng, Zhenxin Zhu, Shanshan Nan, Wei Jing, Min Yao, Lijing Dou, Dan Wang, Xueqiang Liu, Xiaowen Sun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fang WangBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Jiaqi FengBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Zhenxin ZhuBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Shanshan NanBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Wei JingBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Min YaoSchool of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Lijing DouAnimal Husbandry and Fisheries Service Development Center, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Dan WangAnimal Husbandry and Fisheries Service Development Center, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Xueqiang LiuChuang Yu Poultry Breeding Co., Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.
Xiaowen SunCenter for Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Mulei country, Xinjiang 831900, China.
Cunxi NieBingtuan Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Non-Grain Feed Resources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restricted feeding mitigates metabolic diseases and offers a cost-saving potential for broiler production. This study investigated a feeding strategy to reduce costs without compromising health. Four hundred and eighty one-day-old male broilers were divided into four groups subjected to 21-day feed restriction with different daily access times (24, 20, 16, or 12 h), followed by

Indexed as

Agricultural productsAgronomyPoultry immunologyPoultry microbiology

Identifiers

PMID41660265
PMCPMC12877831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.