ArticleiScience2026
Machine learning identifies proteomic risk factors across 23 diseases.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving minimally invasive and rapid detection is a crucial goal in modern medicine. The comprehensive characterization of the blood proteome holds great promise in advancing our understanding of disease etiology, facilitating early diagnosis, risk stratification, and improved monitoring across various diseases and their subtypes. In this study, we collected plasma proteomes from over 3000 patients, representing 23 distinct diseases, encompassing a total of 1462 proteins. Based on histological knowledge, we developed a two-stage hierarchical multi-disease classifier and applied it to perform multi-disease classification on the collected proteomic data. Our results demonstrate that this empirically guided two-stage hierarchical multi-disease classifier outperforms traditional machine learning algorithms in terms of prediction performance, showing better balance and more meaningful feature selections. This finding highlights the positive role that domain expertise can play in machine learning-based disease detection, and underscores the potential of plasma proteomics for multi-disease screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.