ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Enhancing audit quality and reducing costs: the impact of AI in banking and financial services.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Auditing methods have been significantly influenced by the combination of automation with artificial intelligence (AI) and have, in part, changed the roles of auditors and the quality of audits. Sampling-based traditional auditing has several challenges with identifying anomalies or new risks in financial information environments that are becoming increasingly complex and more data-rich. Methods: In this study, AI-based techniques (machine learning and natural language processing) will be applied to a number of the steps involved in auditing financial information. The predictive model will be applied to lead propensity analysis and business volume forecasting, allowing the examination of both structured and unstructured data on financial statements and protecting the privacy of client data. Results: A predictive model utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) was able to identify leads at an 87% rate of accuracy; forecasted business volume errors were less than 5%; and it explained nearly 94% of the variance between the AI model's predictions and the actual loan disbursement amounts. Using AI for full dataset analysis instead of sample-based methods improved auditors' ability to detect anomalies and allocate resources efficiently. Discussion: Overall, the research demonstrates that AI provides auditors the capability to evaluate all data for a company, automate routine tasks, and identify specific areas (high-risk/high-value) that may require further review compared to other auditing methods. The new methodology also allows for early identification of potential risks and improves the overall efficiency of audits without compromising the protection of the companies' data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.