Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Enhancing audit quality and reducing costs: the impact of AI in banking and financial services.

Amar Johri, Anu Sayal, Kim Mee Chong, Maysoon Khoja, Chaithra N, Janhvi Jha, Neha Tyagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amar JohriCollege of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Anu SayalFaculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting and Finance, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Kim Mee ChongFaculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting and Finance, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Maysoon KhojaCollege of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Chaithra NDepartment of CSE (AI & ML), JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Janhvi JhaDepartment of CSE (AI & ML), JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Neha TyagiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Noida, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Auditing methods have been significantly influenced by the combination of automation with artificial intelligence (AI) and have, in part, changed the roles of auditors and the quality of audits. Sampling-based traditional auditing has several challenges with identifying anomalies or new risks in financial information environments that are becoming increasingly complex and more data-rich. Methods: In this study, AI-based techniques (machine learning and natural language processing) will be applied to a number of the steps involved in auditing financial information. The predictive model will be applied to lead propensity analysis and business volume forecasting, allowing the examination of both structured and unstructured data on financial statements and protecting the privacy of client data. Results: A predictive model utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) was able to identify leads at an 87% rate of accuracy; forecasted business volume errors were less than 5%; and it explained nearly 94% of the variance between the AI model's predictions and the actual loan disbursement amounts. Using AI for full dataset analysis instead of sample-based methods improved auditors' ability to detect anomalies and allocate resources efficiently. Discussion: Overall, the research demonstrates that AI provides auditors the capability to evaluate all data for a company, automate routine tasks, and identify specific areas (high-risk/high-value) that may require further review compared to other auditing methods. The new methodology also allows for early identification of potential risks and improves the overall efficiency of audits without compromising the protection of the companies' data.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceauditingbanking and financial servicesbusiness volume forecastinglead propensity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41660226
PMCPMC12876229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.