Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660220›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental vaccine research2026

Optimizing vaccine allocation: a review of epidemiological models with behavioral adaptation.

Ruhan Gudeli, Karthik Mangu, Himanshu Agarwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruhan GudeliIndus International School, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3488-9600
Karthik ManguKognovate Education and Research, Bionest, Avishkaran (NIPER), Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0291-6314
Himanshu AgarwalIndus International School, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8849-2461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate vaccine distribution remains central to epidemic management, particularly when resources are limited and public response varies. This revised review evaluates three epidemiological modeling approaches that guide vaccine allocation decisions: DELPHI-V-OPT (an integrated epidemiological-optimization framework), a hybrid Agent-Based plus Differential Equation model, and Probabilistic (stochastic) Control models. Building on the original manuscript, this revision adds a transparent literature-search methodology, a strengthened, chronological literature review, clearer technical descriptions (especially the bidirectional coupling between agent-based simulations and compartmental equations), and a comprehensive limitations and future-work section for each model. We justify the selection of DELPHI-V-OPT as the primary practical framework for policy use, then introduce and analytically integrate a behavioral variable representing vaccine hesitancy into the allocation optimization. The extension recalibrates effective demand, reduces dose wastage, and provides operational recommendations for estimating hesitancy and adapting allocations in resource-limited and resource-rich settings. The revised manuscript includes a summary comparison table of model features, explicit search strategy, and targeted references that support methodological choices and model adaptations.

Indexed as

Allocation of health care resourcesDelphi model studiesEpidemiological modelsProbabilistic modelsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41660220
PMCPMC12876914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.