ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Factors associated with decent work among psychiatrists: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the current state of decent work among psychiatrists and explored factors associated with their perceptions of decent work. Methods: This cross-sectional study used convenience sampling to recruit psychiatrists from eight hospitals in China. Data were collected online using the Self-Control Scale (SCS), the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS), and the Decent Work Perception Scale (DWPS). A total of 517 valid responses were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with perceptions of decent work. Results: Career adaptability was positively associated with decent work (r = 0.534, p < 0.01), and self-control was also positively associated with decent work (r = 0.396, p < 0.01). Monthly income and professional title were significantly associated with decent work. Significant differences were found between psychiatrists earning less than 8,000 RMB and those earning 8,000-12,000 RMB (β = 0.178, p = 0.001), 12,000-20,000 RMB (β = 0.199, p = 0.001), and more than 20,000 RMB (β = 0.143, p = 0.005). A significant difference was also observed between resident physician and attending physician (β = -0.141, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Income, professional title, self-control, and career adaptability were associated with psychiatrists' perceptions of decent work. These findings may inform discussions on working conditions and contribute to efforts to support the sustainability of mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.