ArticleGlobal heart2026
Evaluation of Quality of Care in Chagas Disease Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chagas disease (ChD), a neglected tropical disease caused by Objectives: We aimed to define the key components of the CCM quality of care (structure, process, and outcomes) for main clinical activities at the three levels of care. Methods: We applied the Donabedian model to define essential components of ChD care at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Key recommendations from the World Heart Federation (WHF) roadmap and evidence-based guidelines were used to identify core services at each level. We also examined two case studies that demonstrate successful implementation of innovative screening and management models. Results: Essential components of ChD care were identified at all levels. Primary care plays a central role in early diagnosis and timely treatment. Secondary care addresses complications through imaging and targeted therapy, while tertiary care provides advanced interventions and rehabilitation. Although structural gaps persist, the implementation of systematic processes and clearly defined outcomes is key to strengthening the quality, continuity, and equity of care. Conclusions: A comprehensive, structured approach to ChD care is essential to improving outcomes. Successful models illustrate that scalable, resource-appropriate interventions can enhance diagnosis and treatment. Integration into routine health systems, supported by universal health coverage, improved data systems, and implementation research, is critical to closing the care gap and advancing equity in cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.