ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Simultaneous prone transpsoas interbody fusion and osteotomies for severe deformity correction: multi-institutional retrospective review.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) highlights the need for effective treatment strategies. While minimally invasive spine surgery has improved outcomes, patients with severe deformity often require more extensive correction. This study evaluates the outcomes of combining prone transpsoas (PTP) lumbar interbody fusion with posterior column osteotomies (PCO) or pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) for severe ASD correction. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study evaluated pre- and postoperative changes in 15 patients with severe ASD [minimally invasive spinal deformity revision 2 (MISDEF2) class III/IV] treated with a hybrid approach combining PTP with simultaneous PSO or PCO. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters included pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), segmental lordosis (SL), and coronal Cobb angle. Patient-reported outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale scores for back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L) pain. Differences between pre- and post-operative outcomes were assessed with paired Results: Complication rates were similar between PCO and PSO patients. Significant improvements were observed in lumbar lordosis (LL) (P=0.002), SVA (P=0.03), TPA (P=0.04), coronal Cobb angle (P=0.03), and PI-LL mismatch (P=0.003). SL did not change significantly at any level. Clinically, ODI, VAS-B, and VAS-L scores improved significantly (P<0.001 for all). Correlations showed moderate to strong negative associations between SL at L2-L3 and patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Combining PTP with PCO or PSO provides significant radiographic and clinical improvements in severe ASD patients. This hybrid approach may serve as a safe, efficient alternative to traditional multistage open surgeries, warranting further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.