Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660182›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026

Ambispective study of fusion and subsidence in degenerated L4-5/L5-S1 discs treated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion/anterior lumbar interbody fusion using 3D-printed titanium open arch cages.

John I Williams, Pierce Nunley, Stacie Tran, Marcus Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John I WilliamsOrthopaedics Northeast, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.
Pierce NunleySpine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Stacie TranThe Spine Network, Highland, UT, USA.
Marcus StoneThe Spine Network, Highland, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common surgical procedure for treating degenerative discs in the lumbar spine. The popularity of ALIF continues to rise due to favorable reported outcomes, leading to the introduction of the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach, which yields similar outcomes with less morbidity. Designs of cages are also evolving to improve fusion rate and optimize clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the performance and safety of SPIRA cages (Camber Spine Technologies, King of Prussia, PA, USA), which are designed and constructed using a novel patented three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium open-arch architecture design. Methods: This was a single center, ambispective study of consecutive patients previously treated with lumbar open-arch cages at L4-5 and/or L5-S1, with or without supplemental fixation. Prospective lumbar computed tomography (CT) scan at minimum 12 months postoperatively was used to define the primary study objectives, interbody fusion, and implant subsidence. The secondary objectives were to evaluate safety from the retrospective medical data, including adverse events (AEs) related to the device or procedure and any consequential follow-up operations/revisions. Study inclusion criteria selected patients with intractable back and/or leg pain having clinical and radiological evidence of lumbar degenerative disc at L4-5 and/or L5-S1 who failed 6 months of conservative treatment and had OLIF or ALIF surgeries from an oblique approach. The patients were at least 18 years of age and were able to provide informed consent to participate per study protocol. Results: A total of 33 subjects with 39 L4-5 and/or L5-S1 levels were included in the study. The cohort had a mean age of 57 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32 kg/m Conclusions: Surgeons have many options when selecting an interbody cage for treating a degenerative disc. While surgical technique is fundamental to interbody fusion efficacy and safety, the cage design has been shown to influence these factors since the cage design itself can promote bone growth and reduce the risk of subsidence. The current study reporting fusion and subsidence rates for the open-arch designed cages supports this novel design's efficacy and safety. The results of this study support the efficacy of the open-arch cage design, which has focused on promoting interbody fusion and minimizing subsidence while maintaining implant safety.

Indexed as

degenerative spinefusionLumbaropen arch cage

Identifiers

PMID41660182
PMCPMC12875816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.