ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026
A Case Report of an Atypical Presentation of Fournier's Gangrene.
Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fournier's gangrene is a well-established surgical emergency as patients can decompensate rapidly, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a case in which a 54-year-old medically complex male presented to the emergency department (ED) with a primary complaint of abdominal pain after a therapeutic paracentesis was performed by interventional radiology just prior to arrival. Upon further questioning, the patient reported scrotal pain that had developed over three to four days. On exam, the patient was well-appearing although he did have scattered scrotal masses with chalky white purulence. Given the relatively quick development, an atypical presentation of Fournier's gangrene was suspected, and the patient was started on antibiotics with urology immediately consulted. Imaging was concerning for subcutaneous gas. The patient was subsequently taken to the operating room (OR) for debridement, where Fournier's gangrene was confirmed by surgical investigation and culture. Significant lessons from the case include the importance of early identification of Fournier's gangrene and having a low threshold to start treatment in coordination with a surgical service for atypical presentations. Topics: Fournier's gangrene, bilateral epididymitis, scrotal pain, urologic emergency, renal transplant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.