Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660170›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026

Cards Against Pulmonology.

Lauren Lamparter, Alisa Wray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren LamparterUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.
Alisa WrayUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audience: This card game is designed to cultivate educational discussion among emergency medicine resident physicians about the assessment, treatment, and disposition of key pediatric and adult thoracic-respiratory diagnoses in a fun, casual environment. It could also be played by emergency medicine-bound medical students. Introduction: Emergency department visits related to the thoracic-respiratory system are common complaints in both the pediatric and adult populations. In the United States, for several years prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, respiratory system diseases accounted for about 10.6% of ED visits.1 In children, respiratory complaints make up the largest percentage of their ED visits, particularly in the fall and winter seasons.2 This number appears to have only grown higher in both adults and pediatrics in the years following the Covid-19 pandemic.3 Thoracic-respiratory disorders also account for about 7% of the American Board of Emergency Medicine In-Training Exam and qualifying exam content.4 Therefore, it is paramount that resident physicians understand the presentation, management, and treatment of a wide range of both pediatric and adult thoracic-respiratory complaints and pathology that mimics these presentations. This game explores key topics in the thoracic-respiratory system in both the pediatric and adult populations allowing for fun discussion regarding management, treatment, and disposition of these complicated disease processes. Topics range from sick to not sick patients and include bronchiolitis, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, COPD exacerbation, neonatal cyanosis, viral upper respiratory infections, and more. Educational Objectives: By the end of this card game, learners will 1) understand the methods of clinical assessment in thoracic-respiratory related diseases, 2) implement escalating levels of respiratory support for thoracic-respiratory pathology in pediatric and adult patients, 3) review and utilize important medications in the management of thoracic-respiratory diseases, and 4) choose appropriate dispositions of patients with various thoracic-respiratory related complaints. Educational Methods: The goal of Cards Against Pulmonology is for learners to further understand the clinical assessment, management, and disposition of various thoracic-respiratory emergencies by providing the next best critical action in a given clinical situation. This game will equip residents to differentiate the sick from non-sick patients and collaboratively discuss the management and disposition of patients with a variety of thoracic-respiratory related complaints.This card game is a cognitive artifact designed to stimulate small group discussion that will enhance the clinical reasoning skills of the medical students and resident physicians who play the game. The clinical content of thoracic-respiratory conditions has been gamified through the strategy of play modeled after the popular card game, Cards Against Humanity. Discussion of key educational points during and after the game provides clarification of learner knowledge to solidify concepts. Research Methods: The game was implemented in a weekly resident educational conference session where 19 resident physicians and several faculty physicians participated in gameplay and immediately following the game, evaluated the educational experience by survey using a Likert scale. They assessed their overall experience with the game, engagement with the game, the game's ability to reinforce existing medical knowledge, and if game content was relevant to their clinical practice. Results: The results were overwhelmingly positive with an average of strongly agreed on every Likert scale in every category and a request for the creation of other similar games covering more topics. Resident physicians stated they appreciated being able to laugh and learn, and that the inclusion of case discussion after a case concluded really emphasized the educational points regarding the medical care of patients with respiratory complaints. They encouraged increased discussion of the medicine after each round. Discussion: Overall, this game was very effective in stimulating conversation regarding the care of patients with thoracic-respiratory related complaints. All medical students, residents, and attending physicians were very engaged and remained excited throughout gameplay. Implementation of the game showed the appropriate small group size is about five to six players to allow for robust discussion and engagement. It is also important for the facilitators to discuss expected outcomes for the patient at the conclusion of a set of case cards to encourage educational value alongside humorous game play. Topics: Pulmonology, thoracic-respiratory system, shortness of breath, cough, viral respiratory infection, bronchiolitis, asthma, COPD, pulmonary edema, pediatric respiratory conditions.

Identifiers

PMID41660170
PMCPMC12880885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.