Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660162›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience applied2026

Old enough to be a model? On the role of maturity in stem cell-based models for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Bingqing He, Erik Smedler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bingqing HeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erik SmedlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental disorders profoundly influence cognition, emotion, and self-perception, and collectively represent a major cause of global disability. Their onset spans distinct developmental periods, from early childhood in neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, through adolescence in eating and obsessive-compulsive disorders, to early adulthood in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Twin and family studies have established that these disorders are substantially heritable, and large-scale genomic analyses have identified numerous common and rare risk variants. Yet, the biological mechanisms through which genetic and environmental factors converge to shape disease trajectories remain elusive. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have emerged as a promising tool for investigating disease-relevant mechanisms in human neurons and neural circuits. However, most iPSC-derived neural cells and organoids resemble embryonic/fetal-stage brain tissue in both molecular and functional characteristics, raising questions about their relevance for disorders that manifest later in life. In this narrative review, we discuss how developmental timing, both in disease onset and in cellular models, shapes the interpretation of iPSC-based findings. We outline how differences in neuronal maturity may constrain or enable mechanistic insight, summarize emerging methods for accelerating or extending neuronal aging

Identifiers

PMID41660162
PMCPMC12873734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.