ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2026
Assessment of the prevalence and consistency of microvascular flow imaging patterns in focal nodular hyperplasia.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify characteristic vascular features of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) on microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) and assess the utility of MVFI in FNH diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study included B-mode ultrasound (US) and MVFI scans of 41 FNHs, 21 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 20 metastases (METs), 10 hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), and eight hemangiomas (HEMs) from 80 patients. Diagnoses were confirmed by contrast-enhanced imaging or histology. Two independent observers evaluated vascular patterns on MVFI. Interobserver agreement was calculated, and logistic regression models using either B-mode or MVFI features were developed to differentiate FNH from other focal liver lesions (FLLs). Results: Interobserver agreement for MVFI patterns was substantial (κ = 0.641, p < 0.001). The spoke-wheel pattern (OR = 51.53 and 35.28) and central artery (OR = 4.96 and 1.95) were strongly associated with FNH. However, the spoke-wheel pattern also appeared in subsets of HCAs (20%-30%), HCCs (14%-19%), and METs (5%-15%). Rim vascularity was common but nonspecific. The MVFI-based model (AUC = 0.891, p < 0.001) outperformed the B-mode model (AUC = 0.814) in distinguishing FNH. For lesions ≥3 cm, MVFI accuracy was even higher (AUC = 0.944, p < 0.001). Conclusion: MVFI enhances the diagnostic confidence of US for FNH, particularly in asymptomatic patients at low risk for malignancy. However, given the potential overlap with certain malignant FLLs, MVFI findings should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.