ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
The impact of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular health in postmenopausal women: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hormone replacement therapy and its association with LATE-NC in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Analysis of inequality in cardiovascular mortality in Isfahan County: a retrospective registry-based study of social and demographic determinants.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) derived peptide NAP prevents musculoskeletal abnormalities in ovariectomized mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Outcomes of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women Aged 65 Years and Older: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menopause represents a pivotal transition in women's health, characterized by loss of ovarian hormone production and substantially increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), once widely prescribed for both symptom management and cardiovascular protection, faced significant scrutiny following the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial, which associated conventional regimens with elevated risks of stroke, thromboembolism, and breast cancer. Contemporary evidence demonstrates that cardiovascular outcomes vary considerably based on formulation, route of administration, timing of initiation, and patient-specific factors. Modern strategies emphasize individualized patient selection, lower-dose regimens, and transdermal delivery methods. The "timing hypothesis" proposes that HRT initiated within 10 years of menopause onset or before age 60 may confer cardiovascular benefit, whereas later initiation may increase cardiovascular risk. This narrative review synthesizes historical and contemporary evidence on HRT and CVD, examines mechanistic pathways including vascular, metabolic, and immunomodulatory effects, and evaluates evolving clinical guidelines. Despite substantial progress, significant uncertainties persist due to trial heterogeneity, underrepresentation of diverse populations, and inconsistent long-term outcomes. Future research priorities include personalized therapeutic approaches, mechanistic investigations, and rigorous evaluation of cardiovascular endpoints to definitively establish HRT's role in preventive cardiology. This review provides updated evidence for clinicians navigating complex decisions regarding HRT use in postmenopausal women, with emphasis on cardiovascular risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.