ArticlePeerJ2026
Hidden-break diversity in pancrustacean rRNA profiles.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the 28S rRNA molecule of many invertebrates, a hidden break splits this large subunit into two noncovalently associated fragments (28Sa and 28Sb), masking 28S in electrophoretic profiles and biasing the standard measurements of RNA quality in extracted tissue samples. Pancrustacean diversity in RNA hidden breaks remains incompletely surveyed, particularly for Oligostraca. Methods: We sampled 12 species spanning Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, and Oligostraca around Valencia (Spain). RNA was stabilized with DNA/RNA Shield, extracted with Quick-RNA MagBead, and profiled on an Agilent 5200 Fragment Analyzer. Peaks were assigned to 18S and 28S fragments using BLAST-inferred gene lengths from reference genomes and annotated rDNA. We analyzed 28S secondary-structure domains (D-regions) using RNAfold and focusing on D3 and D7a. Results: Oligostracans and most branchiopods analyzed showed the canonical single-peak profile consistent with 18S, 28Sa, and 28Sb of similar size. Malacostracans exhibited greater profile diversity, including multiple distinct peaks attributable to expansions that alter the relative sizes of 28Sa and b, including expansions near D7a. Comparative analyses indicate conserved D3/D7a architecture across Oligostraca/Branchiopoda and higher variability with frequent expansions in Malacostraca. Conclusions: Our data extend RNA profile diversity to Oligostraca, refine fragment-size estimates with higher-resolution capillary electrophoresis, and link malacostracan profile heterogeneity to D7a and other expansions. We recommend rRNA-aware quality control for arthropod samples and targeted sequencing of poorly sampled lineages (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.