SynthesisPeerJ2026
Effects of variable resistance training on lower limb explosive power in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of mental fatigue on lower-limb explosive power and anaerobic capacity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Elastic Resistance Bands in Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Neuromuscular Mechanisms, Prescription, and Functional Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of variable resistance training (VRT) on athletes' lower limb explosive power through assessments of jumping, sprinting, and change of direction (COD) performance. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest) from their inception until March 23, 2025. Study eligibility was assessed against the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design (PICOS) framework. Following data extraction, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data analysis was performed using Stata 15 software, with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals calculated as the pooled effect size measure. Results: Fifteen articles involving 442 participants were included in the final analysis. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated that VRT was an effective method for enhancing athletes' jumping performance (SMD = 0.81 cm, Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that VRT may serve as an effective training strategy for enhancing lower-limb explosive power in athletes. However, due to significant heterogeneity among the included studies and potential publication bias, the definitive benefits of VRT require further validation through additional high-quality research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.