ArticleLeukemia research reports2026
Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin with or without rituximab is highly effective as a mobilization regimen in relapsed or refractory lymphoma.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A combination of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (GDP) with or without rituximab (±R) is an outpatient treatment widely used for relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma. Limited data are available on stem cell mobilization following GDP treatment. Method: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 1st, 2014, to December 31st, 2020. Patients received GDP±R before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and were mobilized with either GDP±R or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY). The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients achieving ≥2 × 10 Results: Ninety-two patients (median age 54) were treated for diffuse large B-cell (40%), Hodgkin (36%), or follicular lymphoma (16%). Of these, 83 were mobilized with GDP±R and 9 with ID-CY. G-CSF was administered at 5 mcg/kg (61%) or 10 mcg/kg (37%) daily, typically starting on day 9, after two GDP cycles. A successful stem cell collection at the first attempt occurred in 96% of GDP±R patients, and 94% of patients proceeded to ASCT. No significant difference was found between GDP±R and ID-CY in terms of successful collection (96% vs. 100%, Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a peripheral blood stem cell mobilization at day 15 following GDP±R. It is highly effective and represents a better option due to its simplicity of administration, low rate of hospitalization and low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.