ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Referral route: a determinant of inequity for children with undiagnosed genetic diseases?
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rare diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of the diagnostic odyssey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with rare genetic diseases collectively comprise 3.5%-5.9% of the population, roughly 400 million people worldwide. Undiagnosed rare disease programs have leveraged next-generation sequencing technologies to facilitate genetic diagnoses, thereby shortening the complex diagnostic odysseys that many of these patients and their families endure. However, enrollment data suggest disparities in access to undiagnosed genetic disease programs among racial and ethnic minorities. To better understand this issue, we conducted a retrospective review of our rare undiagnosed disease program to assess whether referral route was a determinant of disparities for minoritized racial and ethnic communities. Participants enrolled in the Yale Pediatric Genomics Discovery Program from 2016 to 2022 were self-categorized into four racial and ethnic groups: Hispanic/Latinx (any race), non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black/African American, non-Hispanic Other. Route of referral was classified as Inpatient, Outpatient, or Outside/Self referrals. Completion rates were the percentage of participants who completed enrollment compared to their respective group. Demographics for program participants were different from Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital demographics, with over-representation of non-Hispanics Whites. Direct inpatient recruitment had a higher yield of Hispanic individuals, which was offset by under-representation of minoritized individuals in the Outside/Self setting. Inpatients had lower referral completion rates compared to Outpatient and Outside/Self referrals. These data suggest that the route of referral may represent different levels of access to care, and inpatient recruitment may be leveraged to promote participation by some minoritized communities. We encourage other programs to examine their cohorts for representation and identify strategies for improving participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.