Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660039›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2026

Machine learning vs. ADM1: Reliable biogas prediction with minimal data requirements in full-scale plants.

Sofia Tisocco, Sören Weinrich, Henrik Bjarne Møller, Alastair James Ward, Liam Kilmartin, Xinmin Zhan, Paul Crosson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sofia TisoccoCivil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Sören WeinrichFaculty of Energy · Building Services · Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstraße 39, 48565, Steinfurt, Germany.
Henrik Bjarne MøllerDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele 8830, Denmark.
Alastair James WardDepartment of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele 8830, Denmark.
Liam KilmartinElectrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Xinmin ZhanCivil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Paul CrossonTeagasc Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Dunsany, C15 PW93, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion harnesses microbial processes to convert organic wastes into renewable biogas, offering a sustainable pathway for energy production. In agricultural settings, biogas plants often co-digest livestock manure with crop residues, yet seasonal variations in feedstock quality introduce fluctuations that challenge process stability and yield optimization. Mechanistic models such as the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) provide detailed biochemical simulations but require extensive substrate characterization, limiting their practicality for full-scale operations. Here we show that a simplified ADM1, alongside machine learning approaches-random forest and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks-achieves comparable accuracy in predicting daily biogas and methane production from a full-scale plant over 2023-2024. All models yielded Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies above 0.78, with random forest excelling when incorporating feedstock quantities and maize silage volatile solids. While LSTM proved effective even with minimal inputs, it incurred a training time 141 times greater than ADM1, highlighting critical trade-offs in computational efficiency. These findings advance hybrid modelling strategies for real-time monitoring, enabling operators to balance predictive precision with data requirements to enhance renewable energy integration and agricultural sustainability.

Indexed as

ADM1Anaerobic digestionBiogas technologyFeature importanceMachine learningParameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID41660039
PMCPMC12874345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.