ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of dentin conditioners on biomarker release and microhardness of radicular dentin: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Outcome evaluation of regenerative endodontic therapy using injectable-platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin in nonvital immature permanent teeth: A prospective observational study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Evaluation of growth factor release from root canal dentin following conditioning with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10% citric acid. Aim: To evaluate and compare the release of growth factors - transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB liberated from the root canal dentin after a final rinse with 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid, utilizing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Methodology: One hundred and seventeen decoronated root canal cylinders were prepared from extracted single-rooted human teeth, and the root canal lumen was enlarged to a diameter of 1.3 mm, simulating an open apex. The prepared samples were divided into three groups based on the growth factors evaluated. Groups were further subcategorized into three subgroups depending on the final irrigant used, i.e., 17% EDTA, 10% Citric acid, and control Normal Saline. After final irrigation, the treated samples were placed in Eppendorf tubes prefilled with one mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated at 37°C for 28 days. The amount of released growth factors in PBS solution was quantified using ELISA. Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test, performed with licensed GraphPad Prism (v5.0). Results: Ten percent citric acid and 17% EDTA significantly enhanced the growth factor release compared to normal saline. Ten percent citric acid demonstrated significantly greater efficiency than 17% EDTA in the release of growth factors. Release of TGF-β1 was highest among all the growth factors in the citric acid and EDTA-treated groups. VEGF-A release was significantly lower compared to TGF-β1 and PDGF-AB in the treated groups. Conclusion: Treatment of dentin with 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid significantly enhanced the release of all the growth factors, especially TGF-β1, with 10% citric acid being more effective compared to 17% EDTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.