ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to assess the canal centering ability, canal transportation, and remaining dentin thickness of three different retreatment rotary systems with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methodology: Thirty extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal with a degree of curvature of 10°-30° were cleaned and shaped using TruNatomy files as per the manufacturer's instructions with standardized irrigation protocol, and canals were obturated with corresponding GP and MTA Fillapex sealer. Postobturation scans were taken. Then, obturation materials were removed using ProTaper universal retreatment files in Group I, Solite RS3 files in Group II, and Retreaty retreatment files in Group III. Then, postobturation retrieval scans were taken. Pre- and postinstrumentation scans were analyzed using CBCT, and the values were obtained on axial view; the centering ability, canal transportation, and remaining dentin thickness were evaluated. Statistical Analysis: The data were statistically evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc test. Results and Conclusion: Solite RS3 and Retreaty heat-treated retreatment groups had resulted in better canal centering ability, less canal transportation, and retained more dentin thickness when compared to the ProTaper universal retreatment system, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.