ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Opportunities and challenges in recurrent diffuse podocytopathy post-transplantation: the critical value of the definition.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monitoring anti-nephrin antibodies in the management of recurrent diffuse podocytopathy.Kidney international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse podocytopathy (DP) is a clinical and pathological entity, which comprises minimal change disease and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). It is characterized by diffuse podocyte foot process effacement resulting in nephrotic syndrome. Cumulative evidence supports that DP is a complex disease caused by circulating permeability factors. Following kidney transplantation, DP may recur and severely compromise graft survival. However, prior studies aiming to define immune and genetic factors implicated in disease recurrence have been limited by small cohorts and lack of utilizing stringent criteria to define DP. In this report, we briefly review the important advances made in understanding genomic and permeability factors involved in DP in the native kidney and in the transplant setting, focusing on anti-nephrin antibodies. We stress the importance of applying stringent criteria to define patients at risk of post-transplant recurrence and share our experience in a cohort of 281 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with native kidney failure attributed to FSGS or other forms of DP. Applying strict clinicopathologic criteria combining nephrotic syndrome and diffuse foot process effacement at the time of native kidney biopsy to define DP markedly increased recurrence rate from 9% to 36%. Excluding selected patients with monogenic forms of FSGS and those with high-risk
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.