ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Explainable machine learning model to predict refeeding syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research Advances on the Impact of Gut Microbiota on COPD: Exploring New Perspectives on the Microbiota-Gut-Lung Axis.Current microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To construct and validate a risk prediction model for refeeding syndrome (RFS) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), identify high-risk individuals before overt electrolyte abnormalities occur, and provide decision support for the timing of enteral nutrition initiation and early personalized intervention. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on SAP patients admitted to Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital (XYFY) between September 2018 and September 2025. Patients were divided into RFS and Non-RFS groups based on the development of RFS after initiating enteral nutrition. Clinical data differences between groups were compared, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection, and six machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to build prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was performed to interpret the contribution of key features. Results: Seven predictive features were identified for model construction. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) model exhibited good generalization ability, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.851 (95% CI: 0.809-0.894) in the training set and 0.762 (95% CI: 0.672-0.852) in the testing set. Calibration curves confirmed consistency between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, while decision curves demonstrated favorable net benefits across different clinical decision thresholds. SHAP analysis ranked feature importance as follows: serum potassium (K), serum sodium (Na), serum calcium (Ca), gastrointestinal decompression, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), diabetes mellitus (DM) history, and diuretic use. Conclusion: The GBM model effectively predicts RFS risk in SAP patients after initiating enteral nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.