Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659755›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2026

Education Research: Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Training Gap: Evidence from a National Survey of Italian Neurology Residents.

Claudio Vozzi, Matteo Sibilla, Daniel Sandri, Valentina Marinato, Giulia Micolonghi, Serena Oliveri, Massimo Filippi, Sara Marceglia, Alberto Priori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claudio VozziClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Italy.
Matteo SibillaClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Italy.
Daniel SandriClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Italy.
Valentina MarinatoClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Italy.
Giulia MicolonghiClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8872-207X
Serena Oliveri"Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-4260
Massimo FilippiNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0479
Sara Marceglia"Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-866X
Alberto PrioriClinical Neurology Unit, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-3851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly becomes an integral tool in clinical neurology, future clinicians will need to master its application in patient care. While previous studies focused primarily on medical students' perspectives, our survey, addressed to Italian neurology residents, aims to assess their familiarity with AI tools and identify educational needs of learners close to clinical practice and care delivery. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey designed by the University of Milan was distributed nationwide to neurology residents from May 22 through July 30, 2025. The questionnaire included items on demographics, self-assessed AI knowledge, exposure to AI training, clinical applications, perceived challenges, and attitudes toward the impact of AI on neurology practice. Descriptive statistics and association analyses were performed. Results: A total of 173 residents (12.7%) completed the survey, with 37% affiliated with research hospitals. Although AI is frequently used in practice, with 40.7% using AI tools at least on a weekly basis, only 30.7% rated their knowledge as "good" or higher. Paradoxically, most residents (79.2%) reported no curriculum-integrated AI education, which was instead significantly associated with geographical background (Χ Discussion: Despite the limited number of participants, our survey provides a representative snapshot of AI knowledge, use, and attitudes among neurology residents in Italy, a critical country in the digital health care transformation, contributing important evidence for international shared recommendations on AI educational needs to support future clinical practice. Although AI tools are widely used, most residents had only basic knowledge and limited formal training, prompting calls for more structured, learner-centered educational modules to be integrated into neurology curricula.

Identifiers

PMID41659755
PMCPMC12879025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.