ArticleNeurology. Education2026
Education Research: Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Training Gap: Evidence from a National Survey of Italian Neurology Residents.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditional Acceptance and the Optimism-Knowledge Gap: A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in Italy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Competence to Mastery: Reframing Neurology's Approach to Competency-Based Education.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly becomes an integral tool in clinical neurology, future clinicians will need to master its application in patient care. While previous studies focused primarily on medical students' perspectives, our survey, addressed to Italian neurology residents, aims to assess their familiarity with AI tools and identify educational needs of learners close to clinical practice and care delivery. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey designed by the University of Milan was distributed nationwide to neurology residents from May 22 through July 30, 2025. The questionnaire included items on demographics, self-assessed AI knowledge, exposure to AI training, clinical applications, perceived challenges, and attitudes toward the impact of AI on neurology practice. Descriptive statistics and association analyses were performed. Results: A total of 173 residents (12.7%) completed the survey, with 37% affiliated with research hospitals. Although AI is frequently used in practice, with 40.7% using AI tools at least on a weekly basis, only 30.7% rated their knowledge as "good" or higher. Paradoxically, most residents (79.2%) reported no curriculum-integrated AI education, which was instead significantly associated with geographical background (Χ Discussion: Despite the limited number of participants, our survey provides a representative snapshot of AI knowledge, use, and attitudes among neurology residents in Italy, a critical country in the digital health care transformation, contributing important evidence for international shared recommendations on AI educational needs to support future clinical practice. Although AI tools are widely used, most residents had only basic knowledge and limited formal training, prompting calls for more structured, learner-centered educational modules to be integrated into neurology curricula.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.