ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Treatment Trends for Anterior Urethral Stricture: An International Survey on Eligibility for Staged Urethroplasty.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Round up.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Anterior urethral strictures impact quality of life and often require surgical intervention. Urethroplasty is the definitive treatment, but consensus on the best approach or timing, particularly for staged procedures, is lacking. The aim of our study was to identify factors influencing the decision to perform staged versus one-stage urethroplasty and determine key factors for the timing of the second stage. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to identify factors influencing surgical decision-making for urethral stricture treatment in adult patients. A survey designed for the study was distributed to 190 reconstructive urologists, of whom 187 returned complete responses. Responses were anonymous to minimize bias. The data were analyzed using STATA 18.0. Key findings and limitations: Factors influencing staged urethroplasty included previous surgeries (74.3%), stricture length (67.9%), and etiology (65.7%). Timing of the second stage is determined by urethral plate characteristics and surgical plate length, with 56.7% of the respondents reporting that the second stage is performed within 6 mo. Notably, 37.4% do not use standardized symptom scales. Findings highlight the role of mentoring and training in surgical choices, which points to a need for standardized guidelines. Limitations include the use of a convenience sample and self-reported data, which may introduce bias. Conclusions and clinical implications: Key factors influencing staged urethroplasty decisions include stricture length and prior surgeries. Most urologists schedule the second stage within 6 mo, guided by mentoring. Future research should develop international staging guidelines, standardize treatments, and assess long-term outcomes for consistent practices. Patient summary: We carried out a survey to find out why urologists choose one- or two-stage surgery to repair narrowing of the urethra, and when they perform the second stage. Two-stage procedures are often used for complex cases and patients who have had previous surgeries, with the second stage mostly done within 6 months. Better tools to measure patient symptoms are needed to improve care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.