ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Preoperative fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although the fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) is an established prognostic biomarker in various solid tumors, its role in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains poorly defined. This study aimed not only to investigate the predictive value of preoperative FLR for overall survival (OS) in NMIBC patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt), but also to develop and validate a novel FLR-based nomogram as a practical clinical tool. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 304 NMIBC patients who underwent TURBt at the Shijiazhuang People's Hospital between November 2013 and January 2024, with OS as the primary endpoint. The optimal prognostic cutoff for FLR was determined by maximizing the Youden index via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Propensity score matching (1:2) was employed to balance baseline confounders. The dose-response relationship between continuous FLR and mortality risk was evaluated using restricted cubic splines (RCS), which confirmed a linear association. Subsequently, independent prognostic factors identified through Cox proportional hazards regression were integrated to construct a nomogram. The model's predictive accuracy and clinical utility were then comprehensively evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, time-dependent ROC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The optimal FLR cutoff was identified as 2.91. Patients in the high-FLR group (FLR ≥ 2.91) exhibited significantly poorer OS (P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.004). RCS analysis confirmed a significant positive linear association between increasing FLR levels and all-cause mortality risk. Critically, multivariate Cox regression validated FLR as an independent predictor for both OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.520, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.149-2.010) and CSS (HR: 1.536, 95% CI: 1.033-2.284). Integrating FLR into a baseline model improved the C-index for OS prediction from 0.739 to 0.772. The resulting nomogram demonstrated robust discrimination (C-index: 0.772), excellent calibration, and superior net clinical benefit in DCA. Conclusion: Preoperative FLR is an independent predictor of overall survival in NMIBC, characterized by a robust linear dose-response relationship with mortality risk. This cost-effective biomarker, integrated into our validated nomogram, enhances risk stratification to guide personalized postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.