ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Mapping Gene Drive Dynamics onto Mendelian Models.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-based gene drives bias their own transmission and can spread even when deleterious, giving rise to evolutionary dynamics that can be substantially more complex than those governed by standard Mendelian inheritance. Identifying conditions under which gene-drive dynamics can be faithfully approximated by Mendelian models would therefore enable the extensive theoretical toolkit of classical population genetics to be applied to gene-drive systems. Here, we develop a general mapping framework that translates gene-drive models into dynamically equivalent Mendelian models, allowing their behavior to be analyzed using classical theory. By deriving both haploid and diploid effective-parameter mappings, we identify Mendelian models that closely reproduce allele-frequency trajectories of gene drives across a wide range of conversion rates, fitness costs, and dominance effects. We delineate the regions of the parameter space where a one-parameter haploid approximation provides an accurate first-order representation, and where incorporating dominance in a diploid mapping substantially improves fidelity and recovers internal equilibria and threshold behavior. Analytic approximations yield efficient mappings across most of the drive parameter space, while a trajectory-based grid search further improves accuracy near nonlinear regime boundaries. To demonstrate the utility of this framework, we apply it to predicting gene swamping in a two-deme migration-selection model and show that the mapped Mendelian system accurately forecasts transitions between fixation and loss under three relevant release scenarios: environmental variation in fitness, engineered fitness asymmetries, and environment-dependent conversion. Together, these results establish a theoretical bridge between non-Mendelian gene drives and classical population genetic models, providing an interpretable and computationally efficient foundation for predicting gene-drive outcomes and guiding the design of gene drive systems and deployment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.