Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659535›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

HIGH-FIDELITY BACKPROPAGATION THROUGH PRIMATE FOVEAL CONES.

Sophia R Wienbar, Gregory S Bryman, Michael Tri H Do

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophia R WienbarF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center and Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Gregory S BrymanF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center and Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Michael Tri H DoF.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center and Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6418-0977

Funding

Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MARGARET S LIVINGSTONE · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
TRAINING IN SLEEP, CIRCADIAN &RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGYT32HL007901 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Charles A Czeisler · 1998 to 2026
$18.5M
Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI POMEROY, SCOTT LOREN · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells and their central projectionsR01EY025555 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DO, MICHAEL TRI HOANG, GAMLIN, PAUL DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2020
$3.9M
Neurophysiology of the FoveaR01EY030628 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DO, MICHAEL TRI HOANG · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
Defining cell types of foveal and peripheral retina by high-throughput, single-celltranscriptional profilingR21EY028633 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DO, MICHAEL TRI HOANG, SANES, JOSHUA R · 2018 to 2019
$487k
Cellular Mechanisms of High-Acuity VisionR21EY025840 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DO, MICHAEL TRI HOANG · 2016 to 2017
$487k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012196NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025555NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030628NEI NIH HHS R21 EY025840NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028633NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007901NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primate vision has exceptionally high spatial acuity and contrast sensitivity. This performance originates in specialized photoreceptors of the fovea. These cones transduce light into electrical signals in the outer segment, and convey these signals to the presynaptic terminal for transmission. Backpropagating signals are also possible, as the terminal receives inputs. Such signals could influence phototransduction itself. To test this idea, we recorded electrophysiologically from both ends of single cones dissociated from the macaque fovea. We found that backpropagation was effective despite the extreme slenderness and length of these cells. Backpropagation was also effective in a passive compartmental model, indicating that amplification by voltage-gated channels is not required. We then modeled foveal cones receiving terminal inputs from retinal networks. Despite faithful backpropagation of these inputs, they appear unlikely to influence phototransduction. Thus, even though foveal cones exhibit effective backpropagation, their encoding of visual information may remain compartmentalized.

Indexed as

BackpropagationBiophysicsCellular neurophysiologyConeFoveaGap junctionHenle fiberPassive electrical propertiesPhotoreceptorPhototransductionPrimateVision

Identifiers

PMID41659535
PMCPMC12873879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.