ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Clocks and Dominoes: Timing Mechanisms of Embryogenesis.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How developmental timings are regulated is a fundamental open question. Two widely considered mechanisms are the clock, in which an internal timer determines when each stage occurs, and the domino, in which the completion of each stage triggers the next. It is often unclear how to establish either mechanism. Here, we construct a quantitative framework that uses the correlation structure of developmental timings to test the clock and domino mechanisms. We apply this framework to human pre-implantation development by using ~1 million images of 2946 embryos acquired during IVF treatment, establishing mathematical models of developmental rate. We find that a domino mechanism governs the cleavage timings, while a pronuclei fade-triggered clock mechanism governs the morula and blastocyst timings. These results are consistent with the cell cycle oscillator governing the cleavage timings and the accumulation of embryonic gene products or the degradation of maternally deposited factors governing the morula and blastocyst timings. We next investigate the physiological regulators of developmental timing by analyzing how the timings are statistically associated with the clinical pregnancy outcome. While embryos that result in a clinical pregnancy tend to exhibit shorter cleavage timings, this association is primarily driven by patient-specific properties. In contrast, embryo-specific properties independently influence the pregnancy outcome and the cleavage timings, so that factors directly determining implantation potential, such as aneuploidy, can only weakly impact the cleavage timings. Taken together, this work provides a robust framework for decoding developmental timing mechanisms, with significant implications for fundamental biology and clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.