ArticleHealthcare technology letters
BTdiagAI: A Web-Deployed Hybrid Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using Optimized MRI Preprocessing and Deep Learning Fusion.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BTdiagAI: A Web-Deployed Hybrid Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using Optimized MRI Preprocessing and Deep Learning Fusion.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnosis via MRI remains challenging due to imaging artifacts, tumor heterogeneity, and time-intensive manual evaluations that introduce variability. While preprocessing is critical for accuracy, comparative analyses of techniques are limited, as research often prioritizes algorithmic advancements. This study systematically evaluates five MRI preprocessing methods (CLAHE, Nyul normalization, N4 bias correction, template registration, White Stripe normalization) and proposes a deep learning framework integrating fine-tuned InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and Xception networks. Features from these models were concatenated, refined via ANOVA and L1max selection, and classified using machine learning. To address class imbalance, data augmentation techniques were employed, ensuring a well-distributed dataset for robust model training. All preprocessing methods achieved greater than 98% accuracy, with CLAHE outperforming others (99.8% on Dataset 1; 99.61% on Dataset 2) while requiring minimal computational resources. The framework's efficacy is demonstrated through a publicly accessible web platform BTdiagAI, that enables users to upload brain MRI scans for automated classification into four tumor categories: benign, pituitary, glioma, and meningioma. This deployment underscores the clinical applicability of the solution, offering rapid, scalable diagnosis with state-of-the-art accuracy. The study highlights preprocessing as pivotal for MRI-based tumor diagnosis, advocating CLAHE for its balance of efficiency and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.