ArticleEJIFCC2026
Intra-and Inter-Analyzer Imprecision of Cell Population Data on Sysmex XN-10.
Article in EJIFCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CBC drawn postnatally from umbilical cord blood can provide valuable diagnostic information for infants admitted to the NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Longitudinal agreement of repeated critical haemoglobin measurements as evidence of sustained analytical quality.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cell population data (CPD) derived from modern hematology analyzers provide morphological and functional insights into leukocytes beyond traditional cell counts. Nevertheless, their introduction into clinical practice requires proven analytical precision and consistency across instrumentation. Method: Two K2EDTA blood samples (one from a healthy blood donor and one from an intensive care unit patient) were analyzed in ten replicates on two Sysmex XN-10 analyzers. Intra- and inter-analyzer imprecision were calculated as coefficients of variation (CV%). Results: Intra-analyzer CV% ranged from 0.2-7.9% and inter-analyzer CV% from 0.6-9.8%. For neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte CPD parameters, intra-/inter-analyzer CV% were 0.2-2.5%/0.6-7.0%, 0.5-6.6%/0.7-7.2%, and 0.2-7.9%/0.8-9.8%, respectively. The mostly used CPD parameters NE-SFL (neutrophil fluorescence intensity) and MO-X (monocyte complexity) displayed very low imprecision, with intra-analyzer CV% of 0.7-0.9% and 0.2-0.5%, and inter-analyzer CV% of 0.9-1.1% and 0.8-1.7%, respectively. Discussion: Our results confirm excellent reproducibility of Sysmex XN-10 CPD, consistent with or even improving upon earlier data obtained with the previous Sysmex XN-9000. The very low intra- and inter-analyzer variability of NE-SFL and MO-X supports their use as reliable clinical parameters, especially for infection and sepsis diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41659287PMC12882073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.