ArticleEJIFCC2026
A Variant in the TSH β Gene Resulted in Discordant TSH Levels in an Indian Patient.
Article in EJIFCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clinically euthyroid patient of Indian origin was identified with persistently undetectable TSH concentrations using our laboratory's third-generation Ultra TSH assay, raising concerns of assay interference. The discordant results, flagged by the treating physician, prompted an in-depth investigation to determine the cause of undetectable TSH values despite the patient's euthyroid clinical status. Over an eight-month period, three consecutive serum samples consistently showed TSH levels below 0.008 μIU/mL on our routine platform. To rule out analytical artifacts such as the high-dose hook (prozone) effect, heterophilic antibody interference, and other pre-analytical or analytical errors, the samples were re-evaluated under various dilution protocols and assay conditions. Reanalysis using two alternate FDA-approved TSH immunoassays (CLIA and ECLIA platforms) revealed a TSH concentration of 6.81 μIU/mL, consistent with the clinical picture and in stark contrast to our initial results. Given the persistence of this discrepancy and the suspected interference with antibody recognition, genetic analysis of the TSHB gene was performed. Sanger sequencing of the entire coding region revealed a homozygous A-to-G substitution (c.223A>G; AGA>GGA) in exon 3, resulting in an arginine-to-glycine amino acid change at codon 75 (R75G) in the mature TSH β-subunit (RefSeq: NP_000540.2). This variant was absent in a control subject of similar ethnic background with normal TSH levels on the same assay, supporting its role in the observed interference. The mutation likely alters the epitope conformation of the TSH molecule, reducing its recognition by monoclonal antibodies used in specific immunoassays without impairing its biological activity. This case underscores the importance of correlating laboratory results with clinical findings and highlights the need for cross-platform verification when discordant TSH values are encountered. Genetic variants affecting TSH structure can lead to misinterpretation of thyroid function, and efforts toward assay standardization and harmonization are essential to mitigate such diagnostic pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41659285PMC12882083What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.