Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659278›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026

Model-Based Electroencephalography Phenotyping Uncovers Distinct Neurocomputational Mechanisms Underlying Learning Impairments Across Psychopathologies.

Nadja R Ging-Jehli, Rachel Rac-Lubashevsky, Krishn Bera, Megan A Boudewyn, Cameron S Carter, Molly A Erickson, James M Gold, Steven J Luck, J Daniel Ragland, Andrew P Yonelinas and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nadja R Ging-JehliCarney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Rachel Rac-LubashevskyCarney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Krishn BeraCarney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Megan A BoudewynDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Cameron S CarterDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Irvine, California.
Molly A EricksonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
James M GoldDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steven J LuckDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California.
J Daniel RaglandDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California.
Andrew P YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California.
Angus W MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Deanna M BarchDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Michael J FrankCarney Institute for Brain Science, Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Brown Postdoctoral Training Program in Computational PsychiatryT32MH126388 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL J. FRANK, STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2021 to 2026
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH126388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BP), and schizophrenia (SCZ) involve learning impairments with poorly understood mechanisms. Understanding both the similarities and differences in these mechanisms is important to guide the development of new, targeted interventions. Methods: A total of 255 participants diagnosed with MDD ( Results: All clinical groups showed learning impairments at the behavioral level. Model-based EEG analyses linked these impairments to distinct patterns in the dynamic interplay between latent RL and WM mechanisms, contrasting with the typical patterns observed in the CTRL group. SCZ was characterized by reduced neural markers of WM, weakening the cooperative influence of WM onto RL (reduced WM recruitment), and reduced integration of negative feedback. Conversely, MDD was characterized by reduced reciprocal influence of RL onto WM, reducing the tendency to upregulate WM contribution with reward history (impaired WM management). Finally, BP was characterized by deficits in both WM and RL recruitment, along with higher WM decay. Conclusions: Behavioral learning impairments that seem similar across clinical groups can be linked to distinct neurocognitive mechanisms via integrative neurocomputational modeling. Our approach provides insights into the interplay of underlying learning mechanisms and how they manifest differently across psychopathologies.

Indexed as

BipolarComputational phenotypingDepressionReinforcement learningSchizophreniaWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41659278
PMCPMC12876727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.