ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026
Efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in first-line and subsequent-line treatments for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center real-world study in China.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lorlatinib-specific outcomes by timing of lorlatinib initiation in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib as first-line or subsequent-line therapy for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( Methods: This study is a single-center cohort study in China. We retrospectively and prospectively collected data on patients with advanced or metastatic Results: As of July 18, 2025, a total of 36 patients were enrolled in the lorlatinib first-line treatment cohort, and 43 patients were enrolled in the lorlatinib subsequent-line treatment cohort for analysis. For the first-line treatment cohort, the median follow-up time was 12.7 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) had not yet been reached; the objective response rate (ORR) was 82.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. For the subsequent-line treatment cohort, the median follow-up time was 19.9 months and the median PFS was 16.8 months; the ORR was 40.5%, and the DCR was 92.9%. Among all patient groups included in this study, the adverse events associated with lorlatinib treatment predominantly comprised hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, edema, cognitive impairment/mood disorders, elevated transaminases, weight gain, and peripheral neuropathy. No cases of interstitial lung disease were observed. The overall safety profile of lorlatinib is manageable. Analysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results from patients with lorlatinib resistance demonstrated that Conclusions: Lorlatinib has shown remarkable efficacy in both first-line and subsequent-line treatment settings for patients with locally advanced or metastatic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.