Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41659263›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2026

Pathophysiology and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases in lung cancer.

Toyoaki Hida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Toyoaki HidaLung Cancer Center, Central Japan International Medical Center, Minokamo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3537-0020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) cause neurological symptoms, including nausea, headache, radicular pain, gait disturbance, and cranial nerve palsies. Lung and breast cancer as well as melanoma are the most common primary tumors in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. The incidence of LMs is increasing, and this may be due to the improved survival of patients following the development of novel therapies, which may be less effective within the central nervous system. Barrier mechanisms in central nervous system such as blood-brain barrier constitute the critical interfaces between the periphery and brain that actively restrict the entry of solutes and cells into the brain parenchyma and leptomeninges. However, cancer cells could metastasize into the meninges via the brain or choroid plexus, by crossing pial blood vessels, or through vascular channels which connect the bone marrow and meninges. Conventional treatments for LMs, such as chemotherapy, photon-based radiation therapy, and intrathecal chemotherapy, have limited efficacy. However, advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of LMs and novel treatment modalities are shifting this paradigm. Recent advances in molecularly targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates therapies, immunotherapies, intrathecal therapies, proton craniospinal irradiation, and expected therapies such as dendritic and NK cell-engaging therapies may improve the outcomes of patients with LMs. This mini review briefly outlines the pathophysiology and current treatment options for LMs.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrier (BBB)Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs)lung cancerpathophysiologytreatment

Identifiers

PMID41659263
PMCPMC12877902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.