ArticleJAAD international2026
Set targets, assess response, intervene early to achieve minimal disease activity in atopic dermatitis (STRIVE AD): A modified Delphi consensus project to optimize management of atopic dermatitis in the United Kingdom.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redefining Treat-to-target in Atopic Dermatitis: Towards Meaningful, Patient-centred Disease Control - An ISAD Position Paper.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines for the management and treatment of atopic dermatitis have been extensively published in Europe and globally, however these are not always relevant to the United Kingdom (UK) clinical setting. Objectives: To develop consensus statements for the optimized management of adults and children with atopic dermatitis in the UK. Method: Consensus statements were developed by an expert advisory panel following a targeted literature review, based on 5 topics (patient centric approach, assessing severity consistently, setting treatment targets, early intervention, and optimizing treatment). Consensus statements were voted on using a 5-point Likert scale in a Delphi over 3 rounds by 12 multidisciplinary, geographically spread participants. Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the voting participants rated the statement as 4 or 5. Results: Strong consensus (≥90%) was achieved for 24 out of 27 statements. The level of consensus by topic was: Patient centric approach (92%-100%); Assessing severity consistently (75%-100%); Setting treatment targets (83%-100%); Intervening early (92%-100%); Optimizing treatment (92%). Limitations: Due to the design and objectives of the study only a small number of participants were invited to take part. Conclusions: The following recommendations have been developed to be practical and easy to implement within everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.